M3C2-EP: Error propagation for topographic 3D change detection

M3C2-EP is a change detection method for 3D point clouds. It extends the well-established M3C2 algorithm by Lague et al. (2013) by introducing error propagation for statistical signal-noise separation.

All research news can be found in our GIScience News Blog. Follow project updates on Twitter: #GEODYNAMO4D and #M3C2EP #3DGeo.

Objective

The separation of change signal from noise is crucial for topographic change detection. The amount of change that needs to happen before it can be reliably quantified (Level of Detection) depends on different factors, including:

  • Which sensors were used to measure the topography (sensor configuration, sensor uncertainties)
  • How the data is processed (alignment of bi-temporal datasets)
  • What the properties of the surface are (material and geometry)

Knowledge on these factors allows making statistically sound statements about change that is actually happening. M3C2-EP provides a framework to include this knowledge in bi-temporal point cloud change detection.

Methods
M3C2_EP

Process of M3C2-EP from data acquisition to final product.

Benefits of M3C2-EP:

  • Make full use of the available data, adding more data will always improve the results (possibly more changes of lower magnitude)
  • Reliable detection of smaller changes especially for objects that appear rough at the scale of analysis
  • Comparison of data from different sources possible while making use of the individual advantages (e.g. ALS vs. TLS)

In M3C2-EP, we rely on the knowledge of the sensor system, the measurement process and the data preparation to propagate errors in distance and angular measurements as well as in the alignment of the bi-temporal datasets. This allows an alternative quantification of uncertainty without assuming locally planar objects.

The concept of M3C2-EP can be implemented for point cloud data from multiple sources:

  • Photogrammetric point clouds often come with associated positional uncertainties
  • Airborne/UAV-borne Laser Scanning uncertainties can be included when the trajectory is known
  • M3C2-EP can also be used in combination with M3C2, e.g. when the required metadata is not available for one of the two epochs

When using terrestrial or airborne laser scanning systems, the uncertainty associated with individual measurements is often provided by the sensor manufacturer or can be estimated under lab conditions. The uncertainty introduced by the alignment can be quantified by analysing stable areas.

In addition to statistical testing, the uncertainties may be used for further analysis, e.g. volume derivation. Accepting that change values come with uncertainties also raises consciousness on the reliability of binary change maps, which highly depend on a user-provided level of significance.

Research

M3C2-EP is featured in the following scientific publications:

Key publication:

  • Winiwarter, L., Anders, K., Höfle, B. (2021): M3C2-EP: Pushing the limits of 3D topographic point cloud change detection by error propagation. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. (forthcoming)

Further publications:

Related Projects
  • AHK-4D: High-resolution and high-frequency monitoring of the rock glacier Äußeres Hochebenkar (AHK) in Austria.
  • Geomorph4D: Characterising multi-process geomorphic change.
  • Auto3Dscapes: Autonomous 3D Earth Observation of Dynamic Landscapes.
Editor: Webmaster Team
Latest Revision: 2021-06-02
zum Seitenanfang/up